Monday, July 4, 2011

images %IMG_DESC_8% . %IMG_DESC_1%
  • %IMG_DESC_1%


    • rajeshkrv
    02-17 02:45 PM
    thanks satish. that was informative



    wallpaper %IMG_DESC_1% . %IMG_DESC_2%
  • %IMG_DESC_2%


    • gcdreamer05
    08-14 01:47 PM
    Hi all,

    I am on h1b right now but had applied only for AP since i do not have valid stamping on my passport but have an approved renewed h1b extension valid till 2012.

    My AP will be expiring coming nov 2009 and have the following questions,

    1) How many days before expiry can i apply for the AP renewal. If i apply now the texas processing times for AP is around Apr 1 2009, does it mean the new AP they will provide from Aug 2009 to Aug 2010 or from my AP expiry date which is nov 2009 to nov 2010?

    2) I am also thinking of applying for EAD to keep as a backup (just in case).
    Can i apply EAD alone now and wait for nov to apply for AP (or should i apply both together) ?

    3) If i do a paper based filing does it mean there will be no request for finger printing?

    Thanks
    dreamer



    . %IMG_DESC_3%
  • %IMG_DESC_3%


    • invincibleasian
    01-12 07:26 PM
    Your H1b will be cancelled without prejudice. You can have only 1 typeof visa stamped on your passport



    2011 %IMG_DESC_2% . %IMG_DESC_4%
  • %IMG_DESC_4%


    • shaji_p_j
    08-05 01:26 AM
    I am on H1B and my wife is in H4 here. She is a nurse and can apply for the AOS before Aug 17 .But she does not have all certificate that makes her AOS approved at this time. We hope that we can obtain the certificate (Visa Screen certificate) by the time the RFE comes. But it is a 50-50 chance only. So what could be the best option for us and consequences of each.
    My case (h1B)
    1. I also apply for AOS with her so that I can get aGC along with her but do not use the EAD .
    2. I apply for the AOS later but before her AOS approved.
    My wife case (h4)
    1. Apply for the AOS but do not use EAD
    2. Apply AOS and use EAD.
    Also do you know around when the USCIS issues RFE once the application is recieved?
    I really appreciate your advice in this.
    Shaji.


    more...

    . %IMG_DESC_5%
  • %IMG_DESC_5%


    • nmuralidhar
    10-01 07:47 PM
    My application reached 13 July at NSC nothing got back. Anyone in this boat?



    . %IMG_DESC_6%
  • %IMG_DESC_6%


    • Ann Ruben
    06-23 02:01 PM
    As long as the labor cert. appeal is timely filed you should be able to extend for one more year.


    more...

    . %IMG_DESC_7%
  • %IMG_DESC_7%


    • askreddy
    02-09 09:51 PM
    Hi

    I am planning to apply for new PERM under EB2.

    Just checking during these days, how long it takes for PERM approval.

    Pls update the timing if you or your friends got the approval in EB2.

    Thanks



    2010 %IMG_DESC_3% . %IMG_DESC_8%
  • %IMG_DESC_8%


    • Blog Feeds
    10-18 08:20 AM
    Stuart Anderson, one of the top thinkers on immigration policy, has written a new paper for the National Foundation for American Policy entitled "A New Immigrant Entrepreneur Visa Aimed at Job Creation in America". Unlike the EB-5 investor visa, this one would be aimed at encouraging start up businesses that create jobs as opposed to looking stictly at maximizing the dollars invested. Here's the quick summary: In designing the new immigrant visa, the key is to avoid the type of high capital requirements ($500,000 or more) present in the current immigrant investor visa category or other immigration proposals. The average...

    More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/10/nfap-time-for-an-entrepreneur-visa.html)


    more...

    . %IMG_DESC_9%
  • %IMG_DESC_9%


    • sirisha
    06-19 07:30 PM
    Hi: Need some inputs from the excperts in this group on using the priority dates from a different I140 filing.

    Have the following 2 cases filed for the same person.
    PD - Nov 2004 - EB3 - Labor Approved - I140 Filed
    PD - Oct/Nov 2005 - EB2 - Labor Approved - I140 Approved

    If we file I485 based on the I140 approved for EB2 case [which has a later PD], can we still send an update to USCIS later regarding Nov 2005 PD and use that PD once the I140 from the EB3 filing is approved? What's the best way to use the highest EB category and oldest PD in this case?

    Thanks,
    Sirisha



    hair %IMG_DESC_4% . %IMG_DESC_10%
  • %IMG_DESC_10%


    • trgtc
    January 25th, 2005, 05:18 PM
    Nice shot, Freddy.

    But clearly NOT "the end of the world".... I can see mountains off in the distance, on the left.

    Time to climb another mountain....

    Jon
    trgtc


    more...

    . %IMG_DESC_11%
  • %IMG_DESC_11%


    • hmehta
    05-21 09:07 AM
    Correct me if I am wrong, but there are no ammendments which address the EB based retrogession.

    http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/vote_menu_109_2.htm



    hot %IMG_DESC_5% . %IMG_DESC_12%
  • %IMG_DESC_12%


    • Ann Ruben
    08-17 07:19 PM
    If your question is whether you will be considered to continue in valid H-1 status after returning to the US using your AP, then the answer is yes.


    more...

    house %IMG_DESC_17% . %IMG_DESC_13%
  • %IMG_DESC_13%


    • atlgc
    09-15 02:01 PM
    how real or possible in getting visitor visa for my brother .

    he is under 30 and working in a non -it field and he is married but spouse doesn't work but studied M.tech in CS(just completed)they want to visit us for a month.myself and spouse both are h1-b and 485 applied. and he will be going to chennai consulate in india.



    tattoo %IMG_DESC_6% . %IMG_DESC_14%
  • %IMG_DESC_14%


    • automaton2
    April 13th, 2006, 01:54 PM
    hope these help

    http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1034&message=11525460 (http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1034&message=11525460) <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>

    <o:p> </o:p>

    http://www.pbase.com/dlcmh/af_ae_config (http://www.pbase.com/dlcmh/af_ae_config)

    <o:p> </o:p>

    http://leongoodman.tripod.com/d70focuspart4.html#The_D70_Manual_is_very_confusin g_about (http://leongoodman.tripod.com/d70focuspart4.html#The_D70_Manual_is_very_confusin g_about) <o:p></o:p>
    anybody know how long it will take to receive receipt after filing I-140 in PP [Archive] - Immigration Voice
    Log in

    View Full Version : anybody know how long it will take to receive receipt after filing I-140 in PP



    more...

    pictures %IMG_DESC_7% . %IMG_DESC_15%
  • %IMG_DESC_15%


    • immi2006
    10-09 12:38 AM
    Folks,

    I filed concurrently I 140 and I 485.

    My application has been transferred from California to Nebraska.

    I wanted to check if folks have seen any updates on thier cases.

    I noticed on the website, for my I 140 status it does not show any date etc, it simply says case transferred to a USCIS office. For some folks it shows on a specific date..XX XXXX we recd your case at this office..

    Can we all share our data under this thread for I 140 filing with 485 on July 2.



    dresses %IMG_DESC_12% . %IMG_DESC_16%
  • %IMG_DESC_16%


    • vaishnavilakshmi
    07-09 07:35 PM
    Hi,

    Yes,there is a topic mentioned that AILF's legal actoin center seeks more palintiffs on EB visa number availability!And Murthy.com is going to update the details soon on this topic in their website.Probably after sometime,it would be posted.

    Refer to after few hours.

    WWW.Murthy.com

    vaishu


    more...

    makeup %IMG_DESC_9% . %IMG_DESC_17%
  • %IMG_DESC_17%


    • cookeroo
    07-23 11:57 AM
    now that you said that... :D



    girlfriend %IMG_DESC_14% . %IMG_DESC_18%
  • %IMG_DESC_18%


    • Templarian
    03-10 01:19 AM
    http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/5856/guessi.png



    hairstyles %IMG_DESC_11% . %IMG_DESC_19%
  • %IMG_DESC_19%


    • visli_com
    06-19 07:31 PM
    I have a question. I heard about new premium processing rule for 140.

    my friend�s six years is going to complete in next month , he has applied labour certification via PARM 10 months back and its pending, did he is eligible to file 140? Or he has to live next month?



    Macaca
    05-25 08:10 PM
    Making History, Reluctantly (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/24/AR2007052402069.html) In a Hill Anomaly, Pelosi Shepherds Iraq Bill She Opposes, By Jonathan Weisman (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/jonathan+weisman/) Washington Post Staff Writer, Friday, May 25, 2007

    In public, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) had done nothing to suppress her frustration as she assented to funding the Iraq war without a deadline to end it. But behind closed doors Wednesday night, she was all business.

    With its members gathered in her office, she told the House's "Progressive Caucus" that she would vote against the war funding bill, but that she also had no choice but to facilitate its passage. Funds were running out for the troops, and she had promised to protect them. The Memorial Day break loomed, and without the money President Bush would have a week to hammer her party for taking a vacation while the Pentagon scrambled to keep its soldiers fed.

    Was she agonized over the situation? Sure, said Rep. Maurice D. Hinchey (D-N.Y.), who attended the meeting. But "we all feel that way," he added. "I feel that way, too. Are we going to just walk away now, or are we going to continue this process, to keep the pressure on?"

    Yesterday's vote to fund the war through September was a historical rarity: the passage of a bill opposed by the speaker of the House and a majority of the speaker's party.

    Two years ago to the day, then-Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) violated the "Hastert rule" -- that only bills supported by a majority of the majority can come up -- by bringing up legislation to allow federal funding for stem cell research. The majority of the Republican majority opposed the law. He voted against it, but he knew it would never become law over President Bush's signature.

    Over his objections and the opposition of most Republicans, Hastert did allow passage of campaign finance reform in 2002, but only because a petition drive was about to force the bill to the floor. The North American Free Trade Agreement passed in 1993, over the objections of most Democrats, who were then in the majority. But NAFTA did have the support of then-Speaker Thomas S. Foley (D-Wash.), as well as the Democratic president, Bill Clinton.

    In contrast, the Iraq funding bill was not only opposed by the majority of House Democrats, it was also ardently opposed by the speaker and even the lawmaker who drafted it, Appropriations Committee Chairman David R. Obey (D-Wis.). And it is destined to become law.

    "We don't relish bringing a package to the floor that we're not going to vote for," Obey conceded before last night's vote.

    Pelosi's agonized decision put her in the company of Foley, who in 1991 brought to the floor the resolution authorizing the Persian Gulf War and then voted against it, and Thomas Brackett Reed, a speaker in the 1890s who voted against the annexation of Hawaii, and then against the Spanish-American War, but allowed both to go forward.

    "To have the chairman and the speaker vote against a bill like this, I've never heard of it," Hastert said.

    But while protesters outside the Capitol condemned what they saw as a capitulation, Democrats inside were remarkably understanding of their speaker's contortions.

    Party leaders jury-rigged the votes yesterday to give all Democrats something to brag about. A parliamentary vote to bring the Iraq funding legislation to the floor included language demanding a showdown vote in September over further funding. A second vote allowed Democrats to vote in favor of funds for Gulf Coast hurricane recovery, agricultural drought relief and children's health insurance. Finally, the House got around to funding the war.

    Republicans cried foul over what they saw as an abuse of the legislative system, but Democrats saw brilliance in the legerdemain. And with such contortions came more appreciation for the efforts Pelosi was making to fund the war in a fashion most palatable to angry Democrats.

    "It was the responsible thing to do, and she's a responsible speaker," said Rep. Anna G. Eshoo (D-Calif.), who is personally close to Pelosi. "You can't just walk away."



    va_dude
    01-04 08:33 AM
    Your passport has nothing to do with you invoking AC21. AC21 is just a way of informing Uscis that you are switching to another job with similar duties, that's all. There's no official form or application to submit.

    Just apply for the renewal of your passport as you would usually do. That's all.


    Posted by Adalfuns at 12:34 PM

    No comments:

    Post a Comment

    Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)